0:00:07hello this is a video articulation submission db
0:00:11so here we
0:00:12images and marcus at ash stephen clark myself tom ridge
0:00:20well start by describing the kinds of stops in my present is
0:00:23is it possible realisation that any crystal geometry
0:00:27when detecting the crystal whole more questions in a set of buttons can coherently sounding
0:00:31sites
0:00:33we can use nonlinearities by local coupling each resonance with a to the system is
0:00:37described by james comes interaction
0:00:40a common in hamilton for the total system here since the change coming something
0:00:44and we note there are several a promising technology stimuli something notably those nations that
0:00:49q t
0:00:51present in a race tracks a lot of attention recently hundred platforms realising strongly colour
0:00:56many by state applied
0:00:57because of the possibilities use them as content similar to interesting facts
0:01:02on the person persons wishing idealise large was also raised
0:01:06but resonator losses in future experiments like to use
0:01:10the first very small
0:01:12and now require external pumping sort become losses
0:01:16so that in my
0:01:17the purpose of our work is twofold
0:01:19on the one hand we investigate how to describe resonator is but physically accurately
0:01:24and the other ones one dissipated this is expected in the future small-scale rise
0:01:30so that's part of our work involves looking at accurately model which is
0:01:34the chain coming haven't model was introduced about
0:01:36if the full description of the rise coupled to double system
0:01:39it's actually citations a joint adam for example are
0:01:44but sometimes the purely prosodic breaks habit
0:01:46which arises naturally incorporate optical lattice setups
0:01:49is used to approximate the dynamics of resonators
0:01:52so its importance new information is approximation about thing to do
0:01:56only taking the full description with the novel aspect not captured by the perceptible
0:02:01so in this work we compared experimentally accessible observable also present in race describer models
0:02:06and that is
0:02:08we need a meaningful way that between
0:02:10we chose to match the one i can structure
0:02:12i details in this matter
0:02:15we don't do not compare spectral correlation functions with small or medium sized arrays and
0:02:20the reader perceptive or jamestown subscription
0:02:23i don't i solution experimentally realistic parameters but coupling one straight road panel in general
0:02:28very important differences between the two models
0:02:31mostly on account of the additional atomic degree of freedom that the full description possesses
0:02:36note the second time dissipate near future experiments were raised we need ways to simulate
0:02:42large and medium sized arrays
0:02:44to solve these databases
0:02:46we use the combination of the matrix per state representation to describe your one trajectories
0:02:53we can this combination is very efficient as we can average are many independent realizations
0:02:58we can also every time steps
0:03:00and in many cases also provide insights
0:03:04so this numerical has been investigated with the two recently proposed anybody effects could be
0:03:09observed in a rise and that probably described in its comes have a model
0:03:13participants were predicted to occur really tonic systems these numbers of approximation
0:03:19but this design is based on permutation and then given by me and characterized by
0:03:23buttons and a strong on the conditions
0:03:26and we also found increase or duration
0:03:28we should best replication importance become glued together so that's one raises a lot of
0:03:33particles random a theory
0:03:36in both cases we calculate an equivalence when we are described it wasn't
0:03:41are there are several differences in tune abilities p without any case
0:03:45and is reflected general conclusions this work the trend is very resonator weights must be
0:03:50described by jane comments have able to make a physical predictions
0:03:55so initial watching at least two three nine questions